A couple copyedits. Early on is this; "These bills are hardly radical. Most are truly straightforward, common sense measures that all but the most diehard libertarians would take issue with."
I think you meant NONE but the most diehard. There was a similar one I can't find now. And then there's one that doesn't involve an obvious language issue but--you seem to be saying that a bill to block AI companies from selling chatbots to children that might encourage them to kill themselves, develop eating or substance disorders, engage in self-harm...is being fought hard, openly, by the industry. They are actually saying they should be allowed to market chatbots to kids that might lead to suicide or mental health crises. Can this be true? Has it gone that far, are we living in Mordor?
Would love to keep the comments dedicated to discussion — feel free to email any copyedit suggestions in the future, you can just reply to the email in your inbox, thanks
Isn’t this a rhetorical question?
😉
A couple copyedits. Early on is this; "These bills are hardly radical. Most are truly straightforward, common sense measures that all but the most diehard libertarians would take issue with."
I think you meant NONE but the most diehard. There was a similar one I can't find now. And then there's one that doesn't involve an obvious language issue but--you seem to be saying that a bill to block AI companies from selling chatbots to children that might encourage them to kill themselves, develop eating or substance disorders, engage in self-harm...is being fought hard, openly, by the industry. They are actually saying they should be allowed to market chatbots to kids that might lead to suicide or mental health crises. Can this be true? Has it gone that far, are we living in Mordor?
Would love to keep the comments dedicated to discussion — feel free to email any copyedit suggestions in the future, you can just reply to the email in your inbox, thanks