Blood in the Machine
Blood in the Machine
The two words the AI industry hates more than anything
0:00
-50:02

The two words the AI industry hates more than anything

I talk with computational linguist Emily M. Bender, co-author of the influential 2021 “stochastic parrots” paper, about why AI industry leaders can’t stop seething over the term.

“Stochastic parrots,” a term coined by four leading AI researchers in a paper in 2021, essentially holds that large language models are not “intelligent” but are rather systems that output material based on what’s in their training data. Now, while LLMs and technologies described as AI today have become more sophisticated and complex over the last 5 years, the term remains a fundamentally accurate way of describing what LLMs do.

Yet the industry hates it like the plague. AI industry folks absolutely lose their minds over the term, and often bring it up, unprompted, just to try to debunk it again and again.

Why does this particular term have a unique capacity to enrage AI industry folks? I had a theory that, even more so than other critiques about shaky financing or dubious functionality, stochastic parrots undercuts the very foundation that the AI boom is built on: That tech companies are building a machine god of infinite power and potential. These firms have relied on narrative to build up and to sell to the world a very expensive, resource-consumptive technology. If it turns out it’s an unthinking system that’s often fallible in predictable ways, well, that might not be worth quite as many trillions of dollars.

To discuss this theory in greater depth, I thought I’d go right to the source—to one of the paper’s co-authors, professor Emily M. Bender, of the University of Washington.

Quick PSA: I can only do this work thanks to readers, listeners, and viewers who chip in a few bucks each month to help me keep the lights on. If you’re one of them, you have my sincere thanks; you’re the reason I can cover subjects and do the sort of reporting so few others will. If you’re a fan of the “Great 2026 Blood in the Machine Podcast Experiment” or appreciate what we’re doing here, consider upgrading to a paid subscription; it takes no small amount of work to book great guests, research, write, and produce the thing, and we’re early days yet. Okay! That’s enough from me; thanks for tuning in, and hammers up.

Articles and media mentioned in the show:

The “Stochastic Parrots” paper
Stochastic Parrots 🦜: Frequently Unasked Questions | by Emily M. Bender | Medium
Emily M. Bender on BlueSky
The AI Con, with Alex Hanna.

Producer Ryan’s Newsletter
Ryan’s Bluesky

Articles mentioned

AI Bros Are Having a Meltdown Because the Associated Press Stylebook Clarifies That AIs Don’t Have Feelings

Weekend Update: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on AI’s Threat to Humanity - SNL

Alec Stapp on X

Trump AI deal rebrands ‘artificial intelligence’ as ‘superintelligence’ | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Trump’s new accord on ‘super intelligence’ includes spelling error

“White House Accord on Super Intelligence” / X

Stochastic Parrots paper

Stochastic Parrots 🦜: Frequently Unasked Questions | by Emily M. Bender | Medium

Nate Silver on X:

View of The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence

“Be willing to destroy a rogue data center by airstrike” - leading AI alignment researcher pens Time piece calling for ban on large GPU clusters

Canada’s AI minister blames OpenAI for ‘failure’ after mass shooting - POLITICO

Parents of teenager who took his own life sue OpenAI

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?